Query “arxiv heap optimization cache-aware 2020” → Cache
optimization exists but for different contexts
Conclusion
Modern literature has not introduced fundamentally new
algorithms for sequential lazy k-way merge beyond classical
approaches.
The problem is well-studied and considered “solved” from an
algorithmic perspective: - Classical algorithms (heap, loser tree)
remain state-of-the-art - Research focus has shifted to: * Parallel/GPU
implementations (different constraints) * Cache-aware optimizations
(implementation details) * Different problem domains (LLMs, external
memory)
Recommendations
Add to Analysis: - None - no new candidates
discovered
Defer to Later Stages: 1. Stage 3:
Mention cache-aware heap optimization papers as future work 2.
Stage 7 Related Work: - Cite parallel k-way merge (GPU
Merge Path) - Cite cache-oblivious algorithms (funnelsort) - Explain why
parallel/GPU approaches don’t apply to lazy Iterator pattern
Archive for Future: - Parallel merging techniques
(if we ever need bulk processing) - SIMD vectorization (if implementing
primitive-specialized versions) - Cache-oblivious structures (advanced
optimization)
Key Insight
The classical TAOCP/CLRS algorithms (binary heap, loser tree)
discovered in Phase B literature review remain the
state-of-the-art for lazy sequential k-way merge.
Modern research focuses on different problem variants (parallel, GPU,
cache-oblivious) that don’t apply to the Iterator lazy evaluation
constraint.
Our comprehensive literature review (TAOCP + WebSearch + Arxiv) has
successfully identified all relevant algorithms for this specific
problem.